Decentralized Solutions That Scale
Smart contracts and dApp architecture built with security and clarity as priorities. Gas-aware implementations, clear upgrade strategies, and integrations that don’t fall apart when users show up.
On-chain code is high-stakes: deployments are hard to undo, and small mistakes can be expensive. This service is focused on secure patterns, careful testing, and conservative design choices that reduce risk.
If you already have contracts, this can also be targeted work: audits, exploit review, test improvements, and refactors for readability so future changes are safer.
Solidity contracts with secure patterns and explicit threat modeling. ERC-20, ERC-721, and custom protocols with gas awareness and comprehensive tests. Security and correctness matter more than cleverness.
Full-stack decentralized applications with wallet integration and sane UX. Ethers.js/Web3 frontends connected to contracts with clear error states, safe defaults, and support for multiple networks when needed.
Code review and vulnerability assessment for existing contracts. Reviewing permissions, upgrade patterns, external calls, and economic exploits. The goal is to find issues before attackers do, and to harden systems with pragmatic mitigations.
Multi-chain architectures and integrations across EVM networks. Bridges and cross-chain messaging are complex and risky, so the focus is conservative design, strict validation, and clear monitoring so failures are detectable quickly.
If your project needs immutability, transparent rules, and composability, blockchain can be a fit. If it doesn’t, a traditional backend is often faster and safer. Part of this service is helping you choose the simplest approach that meets the real requirement.
Sometimes. If you need transparent rules, composability, and trust minimization, it can be a fit. If you primarily need a database and permissions, a traditional backend is usually faster and safer. Part of the job is helping you choose the simplest architecture that meets the real requirement.
Conservative patterns, strong test coverage, and explicit threat modeling. We review permissions, external calls, upgrade patterns, and economic incentives. The objective is not just “no known bugs” but code that is readable and auditable so future changes are safer.
Yes. Targeted work can include audit prep, test improvements, refactors, and vulnerability review. Many issues come from unclear access control, unchecked assumptions, and missing failure handling. Tightening these often improves both security and maintainability.
dApps still need good UX: clear error states, safe defaults, and understandable transaction flows. Wallet integration should be stable and predictable. The goal is to reduce user confusion and minimize failed transactions, not just “connect wallet and hope”.
Let's discuss your project and see how I can help.